Tuesday, 29 November 2016

Looking at REITs/TRUSTs for a change..


At the start of 2016, my investment portfolio was concentrated on the Oil & Gas and Finance sectors. The Oil & Gas stocks were purchased many years ago before their sharp drop in valuation. Still, I am comfortable holding on to them for the long term (Remember to use only your spare cash for investment!). My portfolio of finance companies is made up of banks and financial institutions that was accumulated over the years.
The problem is that the business for both sectors is volatile and this translates to inconsistent annual dividend returns that fluctuates between 2.5-5%. At this stage of my life, I felt that my portfolio should offer some form of stability in its return.
Need for a “3rd Sector” in my portfolio!!
This need led to the build up of a “3rd sector” in my portfolio with the aim of generating relatively consistent annual returns. After evaluating possible options including bonds, highly defensive stocks such as Singtel, SPH, etc, reits/trusts stood out as I believed that they are likely able to support a high and relatively stable dividends return due to their business model. However, not all reits/trusts would fit well into my overall investment strategy. My main concern for reits/trusts lies in their loan structure especially those that pegged their borrowings to floating interest rates. Hence I came up with a set of criteria to shortlist suitable reits/trusts: (1) Hedged against potential interest rate hike risks; (2) Have business exposure in European countries and Asia i.e. Japan; (3) Dividend return of at least 7%; (4) Gearing ratio less than 40%.
Hedged against Potential Interest Rate Hike?
A few years back, I felt that there is a high possibility for U.S./Europe/Japan to raise their interest rates right after their quantitative easing. Since most reits/trusts were still primarily hinging on floating interest rates for their borrowings, they would be well-affected when interest rates rise. The risk is high so I chose to avoid buying them altogether. Over time, my views changed when most reits/trusts began to convert a large part of their loans to fixed interest rates. When assessing reits/trust for investment now, I would usually look out for their % of loans that are in fixed interest rates.
Europe and Japan.. Why?
Over the years, the central banks of Europe and Japan have been buying up their government and/or corporate bonds with the aim of encouraging investors to shift into higher risk and potentially higher return investment products. These central banks also adopted a negative interest rate policy which lead to commercial banks having to pay when they put their excess money with the central bank. This should (hopefully) spur commercial banks to lend more to private companies at low interest rates to support them to expand their regional operations and create more jobs. Another point was that exchange rates have been favourable towards the Singapore dollar against the Euro and Yen. I see this combination of low interest rates and favourable exchange rates to be good business conditions and opportunities for Singapore companies.
Looking at Dividend Return of at least 7%...
Most reits/trusts draw their income from leasing or renting out their facilities. As long as their facilities are rented out, they would continue to receive consistent returns. I set a benchmark of at least 7 % dividend return because any lower would make the reits/trusts less attractive than other investment products such as high dividend companies. In addition, the 7% dividend return caters for a hypothetical 20% reduction in dividend payout; which at 5.6%, would still be acceptable to me.
Gearing Ratio less than 40%!
I prefer companies with low or no debts. Generally, I find reits/trusts with gearing ratio of less than 40% acceptable as there is room for further increase in debt to support loan payments and business expansion, without overly straining their finances.
What have i done so far?
In line with my considerations above, I have recently bought into several reits/trusts such as Ascendas Hospitality Trust, Ascott Reit and MapleTree Logistics Trust. It is crucial to reiterate the importance of performing your own due diligence in evaluating the risks for each of these companies to determine whether they could be suitable for your investment portfolio. Moving forward, I will likely continue to accumulate more reits/trusts. In my next post, I will be sharing more about how I buy and sell stocks by using my “Target Price” strategy.
Together, let us all Go & Huat ah!

GoHuat

Related Websites

Monday, 21 November 2016

Can You Really Pay Less Tax Legally? Yes You Can!

Few days ago, I was clearing my credit card bills and happened to look through my hardcopy tax income for YA 2015 in the same folder. I merely took a quick glance and was just about to chuck it aside until something struck me that maybe I should take a closer look again.

I zeroed into the amount of tax I had to pay for Year of Assessment (YA) 2015 – which I pay with GIRO through OCBC360 to clock as online bill payment – and wondered if there are any means to reduce my personal tax payment. 

Considering that my annual income will tend to increase progressively (hopefully for as long as I work), it essentially means I will have to pay proportionately higher tax. For most working adults, I don’t deny that tax is a nemesis to financial building. Well, we all have to play a part towards nation building right?

Out of curiosity, I googled the Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (IRAS) and CPF website and browsed through a few financial blogs before I make my own assessment. Below is what I’ve found out.


The current resident tax rate for YA 2012 to YA 2016 is shown below.



For those who are unaware, IRAS has released the latest resident tax rate for FY17 with some revisions.



Under the new YA 2017, the only revision is the higher tax for those in higher income brackets. Specifically, the revised tax rates will come into effect if your chargeable income is more than $160,000 and for the next $40,000, you have to pay 18% (up to $7,200) from 17% previously (up to $6,800). There are also new income brackets with a wider spread, in particular, the chargeable income on the first $240,000 and $280,000 (see red box above).

I became intrigued to find out more and deep-dived into the various deductions that individuals can claim to reduce taxes. To my astonishment, there is a long list of reliefs, deductions and rebates that one can claim to reduce taxes!

As there are too many of them, I’m just going to narrow down and use the general reliefs and rebates that are widely common for most taxpayers. For this article, I will also illustrate the different profiles to show how you can pay less tax with the CPF Cash Top-Up Relief.

CPF Retirement Sum Topping-Up Scheme

The CPF Retirement Sum Topping-Up Scheme aims to encourage Singaporeans and Permanent Residents to put aside money for retirement purposes, either in your own CPF accounts or those of your family members (parents/parents-in-law, grandparents/grandparents-in-law, spouse and/or siblings).

Using Cash to Make a Top-up to Yourself or Your Loved Ones

Under the scheme, you can enjoy dollar-for-dollar tax relief! You have the option to make a cash top-up to your own or your loved ones’ Special Accounts (for recipients below age 55) or Retirement Accounts (for recipients age 55 and above). In total, you may enjoy tax relief of up to $14,000 per calendar year if you make top-ups for:

a.  Your parents, parents-in-law, grandparents, grandparents-in-law;

b.   Your spouse or siblings, if they 


do not have income exceeding $4,000 in the year preceding the year of top-up 
(e.g. salary or tax exempt income such as bank interest, dividends and pension); or are 
handicapped;


        c.   Yourself (or your employer makes a cash top-up for you)

Some pointers to note
  1. Tax relief is only for cash top-ups. In other words, the relief does not apply when the top-up is carried out by transferring funds from your CPF Account (i.e. OA) to your own or a family member's Special Account (SA) or Retirement Account (RA).
  2. There is no tax relief if you make top-up for your spouse/siblings who have an annual income exceeding $4,000 in the year preceding the year of top-up.
  3. There is no tax relief for cash top-up if the Full Retirement Sum (FRS) of the individual/recipient's RA is already $161,000 (from 1 Jan 2016, the FRS for an individual who is below age 55 and has CPF Special Account (SA) is capped at $161,000)
  4. The maximum CPF Cash Top-up relief is $14,000 (maximum $7,000 for self and maximum $7,000 for family members). See table below.

Amount of Cash Top-up to Own / Family Members’ SA/RA
Amount of Relief
$7,000 and below
Dollar-for-dollar tax relief
More than $7,000
Capped at $7,000

For better illustration, let’s see three typical profiles which qualify for income tax reduction.

Mr Lim is 33 years old, married with no kids. He is an operations manager at an F&B SME who draws a basic salary of $5,500 per month with a 13th month bonus. As such, his gross annual income in 2016 works out to $71,500. He tops up $7,000 into his SA and $7,000 into his father-in-law’s RA who is a retiree.

Under the CPF relief cap, Mr Lim’s salary has not exceeded the $6,000 per month cap required to attract CPF contributions. Any excess contribution beyond $6,000 is considered voluntary and does not quality for CPF relief.

Do note the difference when Mr Lim decides to top up $7,000 cash into his own CPF SA and another $7,000 into his father-in-law’s RA who is a retired teacher. The comparison table for Mr Lim’s income tax statement for YA 2016 will look something like this:


Without CPF Cash Top-Up
With CPF Cash Top-Up
Employment Income
$71,500
$71,500
Assessable Income
$71,500
$71,500
Less: Personal Reliefs

$1,000
$1,000
$3,000
$3,000
$14,300
$14,300
-
$14,000
Chargeable Income
$53,200
$39,200
Tax on the First $40,000
$550
-
Tax on the Next $40,000 @7%
$13,200 x 7%
= $924
-
Tax on the First $30,000
-
$200
Tax on the Next $10,000 @3.5%
-
$9,200 x 3.5%
= $322
Total Tax Payable
$550 + $924
= $1,474
$200 + $322
= $552
1Earned Income - Available to individuals who are gainfully employed or carrying on a trade, business, profession or vocation.
2NSman Self - All eligible operationally ready National Servicemen (NSmen) are entitled to NSmen tax relief.
3CPF/Provident Fund - Available to all Singaporeans/PRs employees – calculated based on Ordinary Wage and Additional Wage.

As you can see, Mr Lim is eligible for $14,000 tax relief when he contributes $14,000 to his own and wife’s SA. The tax was lowered to $552 from $1,474. That is a whopping 63% reduction!

Let’s see another example.

Jane is 24 years old and works in a digital marketing firm. She earns $3,400 per month. Her gross annual income in 2016 amounts to $40,800. She tops up $2,000 into her SA.

Do note the difference if Jane decides to top up $2,000 cash into her own CPF SA. The comparison table for Jane’s income tax statement for YA 2016 will look something like this:


Without CPF Cash Top-Up
With CPF Cash Top-Up
Employment Income
$40,800
$40,800
Assessable Income
$40,800
$40,800
Less Personal Reliefs
Earned Income
$1,000
$1,000
CPF/Provident Fund
$8,160
$8,160
CPF Cash Top-Up Relief for Self
-
$2,000
Chargeable Income
$31,640
$29,640
Tax on the First $30,000
$200
-
Tax on the Next $10,000 @3.5%
$1,640 x 3.5%
= $57.40
-
Tax on the First $20,000
-
$0
Tax on the Next $10,000 @2%
-
$9,640 x 2%
= $192.80
Total Tax Payable
$200 + $57.40
= $257.40
$192.80

After CPF employee deduction (20% of wage), Jane will be left with a net income of about $32,640. If she put in $7,000, it may be a mouthful for her as she doesn’t earn as much as Mr Lim. However, she calculated an acceptable amount that she is willing to top up and yet not compromise on her day-to-day cash flow. She then decides to voluntarily top up $2,000 to her SA. Under YA 2016, her tax was reduced to a lower income tax bracket of $20,000 instead of $30,000 (if she hasn’t made the cash top up). As a result, Jane’s tax was lowered to $192.80 from $257.40 and that is a 25% reduction!

For a young working adult, the few hundred savings can make a difference. Moreover, Jane is only 24 years old and she has a long way to go before she reaches 55. Just imagine the compounding effect Jane stands to gain in her Special Account which attracts up to 5% if she top up her SA on a regular basis!

CPF members currently earn interest rates of up to 3.5% per annum on their OrdinaryAccount (OA) monies, and up to 5% per annum on their Special and MedisaveAccount (SMA) monies. Retirement Account (RA) monies currently earn up to 5%per annum. The above interest rates include an extra 1% interest paid on thefirst $60,000 of a member’s combined balances (with up to $20,000 from the OA).
Let’s see one more example.

Christopher, 40, is a director at a private firm. He is married with a 9-year-old kid. His monthly basic income is $9,500 and gross annual income in 2016 is $114,000. He tops up $7,000 into this SA and $7,000 into his wife’s SA who is a housewife.

Christopher’s monthly salary has exceeded the $6,000 CPF salary ceiling. For example, if you earn $6,500 in a calendar month, only $6,000 would attract CPF contributions; the remaining $500 would not.​​​ Likewise, any excess contribution beyond $6,000 is considered voluntary and does not quality for CPF relief.

The CPF Ordinary Wage (OW) ceiling was raised from $5,000 to $6,000 from 1 Jan 2016, to keep pace with wage growth in recent years. The CPF Additional Wage (AW) was also increased in tandem from $85,000 to $102,000 (equivalent to 17 months of CPF salary ceiling to $6,000.  As such, the maximum amount of mandatory and voluntary contributions that a CPF member (including employees and self-employed persons) can receive in a year is capped at the CPF Annual Limit.

Therefore, the comparison table for Christopher’s income tax statement for YA 2016 will look something like this:


Without CPF Cash Top-Up
With CPF Cash Top-Up
Employment Income
$114,000
$114,000
Assessable Income
$114,000
$114,000
Less Personal Reliefs

Earned Income
$1,000
$1,000
CPF/Provident Fund
$14,400
$14,400
NSman Self
$1,500
$1,500
$4,000
$4,000
CPF Cash Top-Up Relief for Self and Spouse
-
$14,000
Chargeable Income
$93,100
$79,100
Tax on the First $80,000
$3,350
-
Tax on the Next $40,000 @11.5%
$13,100 x 11.5%
= $1,506.50
-
Tax on the First $40,000
-
$550
Tax on the Next $40,000 @7%
-
$39,100 x 7%
= $2,737
Total Tax Payable
$3,350 + $1,506.50
= $4,856.50
$550 + $2,737
= $3,287
NSman Self - Ex-NSmen or NS-liable ex-regular servicemen above the statutory age are given the base quantum of $1,500.

As you can see, Christopher is eligible for $14,000 tax relief when he contributes $14,000 to his own and wife’s SA. The tax was lowered from $4,856.50 to $3,287 and that is a 32% reduction!  

Based on the three profiles above, what I am trying to illustrate is that while nobody can evade tax, you can take advantage of the CPF Retirement Sum Topping-Up Scheme to pay less tax.

However, there are both advantages and disadvantages if you top up cash into your CPF accounts.

Advantages (+):


1.   You get to enjoy up to 5% guaranteed no-risk interest rate for as long as your money compound and grow in the SA! Surely better than any fixed bank deposits available in the market!

2.   You get to enjoy tax relief of up to $14,000 which effectively trims your payable tax and likely ‘downgrade’ your income tax bracket so you pay significantly lesser tax!

3.   The earlier you start, the more money you can grow to reach the CPF Minimum Sum faster! After all, the monies in CPF still belong to you!


Disadvantages (-):

4.   For those who don’t earn much and have lots of bills to pay, it may be challenging to cough out large sums of $7,000 or $14,000 and put in the SA which will be locked up for a substantial period of time. During emergency, cash liquidity is very important.


5.   The process is irreversible. You can only withdraw the monies when you reach age of 55, provided you meet the CPF Minimum Sum.


6.   The interest rates in CPF are reviewed quarterly (for OA, SA and MA) and yearly (for RA). It is anyone’s guess whether the same rates will be maintained, reduced or increased going forward.


Be Rewarded for Topping Up Early

When you top up early, your CPF savings earn more interest!

If you are keen to top up cash into SA, you have to do it within the Year of Assessment (YA), starting on 1 Jan and ending on 31 Dec so that you will be eligible for the CPF tax relief.

Top up in Jan each year rather than Dec, and you could earn around 20% more interest on your CPF savings in just 10 years.

Source: CPF Website

There are many schools of thought. Some says it’s better to build your own retirement funds. Some says you can depend on CPF. In any case, you need to evaluate your own needs and work out the math. I am confident you can make the best decision for yourself!

Lastly, the CPF Retirement Sum Topping-Up Scheme is not the only way you can reduce your tax. There is the SupplementaryRetirement Scheme (SRS) too.

So top up early to:
✓ Grow your CPF savings faster,
Avoid the year-end rush, and
Avoid missing out on the year-end tax relief deadline.

Do you think topping up cash in CPF account is a good tax-reducing method? Feel free to share your views :)

It can be easy to pay less tax. Huat ah!


Cheers,
EzHuat

Related posts:

What's Next after Saving?